Hello Friends
This is my first article on my blog and I am going to dedicate it to my hometown "Yavatmal".
This article contains brief history of Yavatmal. Hope You may find this useful.
Early history―legandary period.
Yavtamal was civilised near about 272BC. It is not possible to compile a connected history of the Yavtamal District, which, as at present constituted, is a creation of very recent years; and materials for tracing the social and economic condition of the people are scanty in the extreme. All that can be done is to follow the course of events connected with well-known historical sites in the District or near its borders, and occasionally to trace the progress of armies through its lands. Yavtamal , with the rest of Berar, must have formed part of the legendary kingdom of Vidarbha mentioned in the Mahabharata, with the eponymous capital of which Bidar in the Nizam's Dominions has been identified; and legend identifies the village of Kelapur, which gives its name to one of the talukas of the District, with Kuntalapur, one of the cities of Vidarbha; but the identification of sites in this nebulous kingdom must always be a matter of pure conjecture. The name of the kingdom has, however, been preserved in its adjectival form Vaidarbha in the name of a small stream which rises on the plateau to the east of Kelapur and flows into the Penganga. The Sunga dynasty -Berar formed part of the empire of Asoka Maurya, who reigned from 272 to 231 B. C. , but before the disruption of the Maurya empire seems to have regained independence under a local chieftain, for towards the end of the reign of Pushyamitra Sunga, who had commanded the forces of Brihadratha, the last Maurya emperor, and, having slain his master, had established an independent dynasty with its capital at Vidisa, the modern Bhilsa, Agnimitra, his son, found it necessary to make war on his neighbour, the Raja of Vidarbha. The latter was defeated, and the river Wardha was made the boundary between the two kingdoms. There is no indication of the dynasty to which this Raja of Vidarbha belonged, or of the extent of his do-minions ; but the incident is mentioned as one which affected Eastern Berar in times which, in the present state of our historical knowledge, may almost be termed prehistoric. The Vakatakas and other Hindu kingdoms. -It is unnecessary, in considering the history of the Yavtamal District, to trace the connection of the Andhras, Sakas, Pahlavas and Yavanas with Berar; but it is practically certain that the District with most, if not the whole, of the rest of the Province, formed part of the dominions of the Vakataka dynasty. Of this line of kings little is known; but if their capital was, as has been conjectured, at Bhandak, a village near Chanda, the Yavtamal District was very near the seat of Government. A short inscription in Cave XVI at Ajanta gives the names of seven members of the Vakataka family, and from other sources we know that ten Rajas, the names of all of whom, save one, have been handed down, ascended the throne. The first was Vindhyasakti, who has been variously placed in A. D. 275, 400, and, allowing 25 years as the average length of a reign, 575; but all of these dates are very uncertain. The Chalukyas and the Rashtrakutas have left no monuments in the District. In the latter half of the tenth century it was included in the kingdom of Vakpati II, Munja, the Paramara Raja of Malwa, whose dominions stretched southwards to the Godavari; but about 995 A. D. , Taila II defeated and captured the Raja of Malwa, and Berar thus fell once more under the sway of the Chalukyas. Towards the end of the twelfth century most of the northern districts of the Chalukya kingdom were seized by the Yadavas of Deogiri, but it may be doubted whether the whole, if any part, of the Yavtamal District was annexed by this dynasty. The eastern tracts were probably occupied by the Gonds, whose power in the neighbourhood of Chanda seems to have waxed as that of the Chalukyas waned. Muhammadan period―the Bahmani dynasty. -The District did not lie in the way of the Muhammadan invaders of the Deccan, and the raid of Ala-ud-din Khilji in 1294 can scarcely have affected it; but the occupants of the Yavtamal District, whether Gonds or Yadavas, were compelled to relax their hold when the Muslims consolidated their power in the Deccan, and when Ala-ud-din Bahman [This was his correct title as by shown by a contemporary inscription and by legends on coins. The fantastic epithets bestowed upon him by various historians are connected with vain tales. ] Shah, the founder of the Bahmani dynasty who proclaimed himself independent in 1347, organised his kingdom, he divided it into four tarafs or provinces, of which the northernmost was Berar, the southern boundary of which was probably the Godavari . The fortress of Mahur, second in importance to Gawilgarh only, dominated the southern part of the Yavtamal District; and its strength was usually sufficient to keep the Gonds at bay. A fortress of secondary importance, which then existed at Kalam, was the stronghold of the northern part of the District; and the garrisons of these two places of arms were able as a rule to prevent the Gonds of Chanda from crossing the Wardha which was probably then, as now, the eastern boundary of the District. The District, however, was not always safe. Thus, in 1398-99 while the army of Berar under its commander, Salabat Khan, was absent from the Province during the campaign of Firoz Shah, the eighth king of the Bahmani dynasty, against Harihara II of Vijayanagar, Narsingh Deo, the Gond Raja of Kherla, overran Berar from north to south and established himself in Mahur. It seems strange that the attack was from Kherla rather than from Chanda, but Narsingh Deo was probably instigated by the Sultan of Malwa, and it is not certain that he received no help from Chanda. The whole of the Yavtamal District was now in the hands of the invaders, and Firoz Shah, on the conclusion of his campaign against Vijayanagar, marched northwards to recover his lost territory. He besieged Mahur and recaptured it from the Gonds in 1400, and then marched through the District towards Ellichpur, where he halted while his generals pushed on to Kherla and reduced the Gonds to obedience. After receiving the Gond chieftain's humble submission Firoz Shah returned to Gulbarga , but it is not certain whether he returned as he had come, through the Yavtamal District, or whether he followed the more usual route through Western Berar . Ahmad Shah. - In 1422 Firoz Shah was deposed by his brother Ahmad, who ascended the throne in Gulbarga , and was employed immediately after his accession in bringing to a successful conclusion a war with Vijayanagar which, in the reign of Firoz, had opened disastrously for the Musalmans. The army of Berar bore an honourable part in Ahmad Shah's successes against the Hindus of the south, but the defeat of the Musalmans before the deposition of Firoz, and the absence of the provincial army, had encouraged rebels to assert themselves in Eastern Berar . Mahur was held by "an infidel," whether an officer from Chanda or a disaffected Hindu zamindar is doubtful. The fortress of Kalam had also been captured from the royal troops, either by or at the instigation of the Gond ruler of Chanda, as will be seen from the action taken by Ahmad Shah. Ahmad marched to Mahur and laid siege to the place. The garrison offered to surrender on condition that their lives were spared. The terms were granted and broken, the defenders being massacred by Ahmad Shah's order after they had surrendered. Kalam was Ahmad's next care. He marched northwards through the District and captured this fortress without difficulty. That the ruler of Chanda was largely responsible for these troubles is evident from the fact that Ahmad Shah, who had many other matters to occupy him and would not have been likely to waste his strength in acts of wanton aggression, sent an expedition from Kalam into the Chanda dominions where, besides ravaging the country, the Musalmans captured a diamond mine. The locality of the mine is not precisely indicated, but it is mentioned again at a later period, and it would be interesting to trace the situation of ancient diamond workings in the Central Provinces . War with Kherla. -From Kalam Ahmad Shah marched to Ellichpur, his actions in which place, being directed principally towards strengthening the northern frontier with a view either to meeting attacks or to extending his dominions, do not directly concern the Yavtamal District. Having completed his arrangements on the northern frontier he retired in a leisurely manner towards Gulbarga in 1428, and Hoshang Shah, of Malwa, took advantage of this retrograde movement to attack Narsingh Deo of Kherla, whom he had been unable to detach from his allegiance to the Bahmani king. The army of Berar under Abdul Kadir, the Khan-i-jahan, was ordered to march to the assistance of Narsingh Deo, while Ahmad Shah returned northwards to its support. His leisurely movements fostered the belief that he feared to meet Hoshang in the field, and Hoshang openly boasted that Ahmad dared not encounter him. Ahmad, much incensed by this boast, set forth to attack Hoshang but was dissuaded from doing so by the doctors of religion in his camp, and contented himself with sending a message to warn Hoshang against interfering with a vassal of Gulbarga. After the despatch of this message he retired towards the Yavtamal District followed by Hoshang, who was now convinced that Ahmad feared him. Hoshang's entrance into Berar removed the religious scruples which had hitherto restrained Ahmad from attacking a brother Muslim, and he halted his army and awaited the advance of the army of Malwa, which moved forward all unprepared for any opposition. The invaders suffered a severe' defeat and Hoshang Shah fled, leaving the ladies of his harem in the hands of the victors. As he fled towards Mandu the Gonds of Kherla fell upon his beaten army and completed the heavy tale of slaughter. Ahmad Shah's religious scruples once more asserted themselves, and in compensation for the loss which had been inflicted on the army of Malwa by an unbelieving foe he despatched Hoshang's ladies to him under the charge of a trusty guard, with many eunuchs whom he presented to him as a free gift. It is only fair to say that there is another version of this story of the war between Hoshang Shah and Ahmad Shah in Berar and that according to that version Ahmad Shah was the aggressor and was marching to attack Narsingh Deo when Hoshang came to the latter's aid. There is something to be said for this version for it is improbable that Narsingh Deo gave much thought to his allegiance to Gulbarga when Firoz Shah was in difficulties with Vira Vijaya of Vijayanagar, and it is not unlikely that he was concerned in the occupation of Mahur and Kalam; but on the whole the version first given is to be preferred. Narsingh Deo accompanied Ahmad Shah on his return march through the Yavtamal District, and parted from him at Mahur whence he was dismissed with many rich presents. In 1433 the Bahmani kingdom was exhausted after a war with Gujarat ,, and Hoshang Shah, taking advantage of its condition, attacked and annexed Kherla, slaying Narsingh Deo. Ahmad Shah at once marched into Berar and was on the point of attacking Hoshang when Nasir Khan, king of Khandesh, intervened, prevented an outbreak of war between his two powerful neighbours, and proposed terms of peace which were accepted by both parties. These were that Hoshang Shah should retain possession of Kherla, and that Berar should continue to form part of Ahmad Shah's kingdom. These terms were most unfavourable to Ahmad Shah, and his acceptance of them is an indication of the extent to which his kingdom had suffered in the war with Gujarat . It is probable that in consequence of his weakness the Yavtamal District as well as the rest of Berar was subject to inroads from Malwa and Chanda, and the events of his son's reign bear out this view. Ala-ud-din Ahmad II. -Ahmad Shah died in 1435 and was succeeded by his eldest son, Ala-ud-din Ahmad II, who had married the daughter of Nasir Khan Faruki, the ruler of Khandesh. His treatment of this lady was such as to lead her to complain to her father, and Nasir Khan prepared to attack his powerful son-in-law. Having obtained the sanction of Ahmad Shah of Gujarat to his design, he proceeded to tamper with the fidelity of the nobles of Berar . He claimed descent from the second Khalifah, Umar al-Faruk, and he succeeded in persuading many of the nobles of the Province that if they fell fighting in the cause of the descendant of so great a pillar of Islam they would receive the eternal reward promised to martyrs for the faith. Then, with ridiculous inconsistency, he enlisted the aid of an infidel ally, the ' raja of Gondwana,' that is to say, the ruler of Chanda, since Kherla had been suppressed. Nasir Khan was defeated and driven back to his capital, Burhanpur. The details of the campaign need not be recounted since the Yavtamal District was not the theatre of war, but as the Gond chieftain did not take the field with his ally his assistance probably consisted in the ravaging of Eastern Berar ; and the Yavtamal District must have suffered severely. From the fact that Ala-ud-din Ahmad Shah's general posted troops in Balapur and Ellichpur to check the incursions of the Gonds, it would seem that these incursions extended far beyond the limits of the District. Ellichpur is not favourably situated for the purpose of checking inroads from Chanda, but Muhammadan. historians invariably make the mistake into which the first British officers appointed to the administration of Berar fell, and describe the Korkus of the Melghat as Gonds. The rebellion of Jalal Khan. -In 1453 Jalal Khan, who had married Ala-ud-din Ahmad's sister, rebelled in Telingana and attempted to raise his son, Sikandar Khan, the grand-son of Ahmad Shah I, to the throne. Ala-ud-din Ahmad Shah assembled his forces and Jalal Khan sent Sikandar Khan to Mahur in order that he might create a diversion there. Sikandar Khan occupied Mahur and sent a 'message to Mahmud Shah Khilji, of Malwa, informing him that the Bahmani king was dead but that his attendants were concealing the fact of his death for their own ends. He added that if Mahmud Shah took the field Berar and Telingana would fall into his hands without a struggle. Mahmud Shah believed this report, and, after consulting Adil Khan II, the ruler of Khandesh, invaded Berar in 1456, marched through the Yavtamal District to Mahur, and encamped in the plains about that fortress. On hearing of this aggression Ala-ud-din Ahmad Shah changed his plans. He left Khaja Mahmud Gawan to act against Jalal Khan in Telingana; detailed the army of Berar to watch Adil Khan of Khandesh and to prevent him from co-operating with Mahmud Shah; ordered Kasim Beg Saffshikan, governor of Daulatabad, to march on Mahur; and himself, with his household troops and the army of Bijapur, marched towards the same fortress. Mahmud Shah was very wroth when he learnt how he had been tricked by Sikandar Khan, and, being unprepared to meet Ala-ud-din Ahmad in the field, fled towards Mandu by night, leaving behind him an officer with instructions to prevent Sikandar from returning to his former allegiance and to send him as a captive to Mandu should he show any inclination to make his sub-mission to Ala-ud-din Ahmad. Sikandar Khan discovered that he was virtually in custody and contrived to elude his jailor and to escape from Mahur with two thousand men. He fled to Nalgonda, where Khaja Mahmud Gawan was besieging his father, and here both father and son submitted and were pardoned. Fakhr-ul-Mulk, the Turk who had been governor of Mahur before he was ejected by Sikandar Khan, was reinstated by Ala-ud-din Ahmad Shah. Nizam Shah. -. Nizam Shah, the twelfth king of the Bahmani, ascended the throne in 1461 at the age of eight in Bidar, whither the capital had been removed by Ahmad Shah I. Mahmud Shah Khilji of Malwa, taking advantage of the extreme youth of Nizam, invaded his dominions by way of Western Berar , drove the young king from his capital, and laid siege to the citadel of Bidar. But Nizam Shah's nobles appealed for help to Mahmud Shah of Gujarat , who soon appeared on the frontier with 80,000 horse, and rallied their own forces. The retreat of Mahmud of Malwa by way of Western Berar was now cut off, and Khaja Mahmud Gawan, with an army composed of the troops which he had succeeded in rallying and some cavalry placed at his disposal by the king of Gujarat, was closing in upon him from the west, and cut off his supplies. The army of Malwa was now reduced to great distress, and Mahmud Shah Khilji was compelled to raise the siege of Bidar and set forth on a disastrous retreat through the Yavtamal District. Here he was harassed by Khaja Mahmud Gawan, who hung upon his rear with 40,000 horse, and by an army of 10,000 horse which had been thrown into Berar to cut off his retreat, and which menaced his left flank. The retreating army suffered severely during its march through the District, and the miserable remnant of it was nearly exterminated by the Korkus in the Melghat before it could reach Mandu. The District suffered equally with the rest of Berar from the severe famine which followed the failure of the rains in 1473 and 1474, in the reign of Muhammad III, the thirteenth king of the Bahmani dynasty, and most of those who escaped death from starvation fled into Malwa. In 1475 rain fell, but the recovery of the Province was slow, for there were few left to till the soil. Administrative reforms. -. At this time the subordinate governor of South-eastern Berar , which included the Yavtamal District, was Khudawand Khan, the African, who had his head-quarters at Mahur; and in 1480 Muhammad III, by the advice of Khaja Mahmud Gawan, divided the four original provinces of the Bahmani kingdom into eight smaller provinces. Berai was divided into the provinces of Gawil and Mahur, and Fath-ullah Imad-ul-Mulk, who had been governor of the whole of the old province, retained the northern division, while Khudawand Khan, the African, was appointed governor of the new province of Mahur . Of the boundaries of the new provinces we have, unfortunately, no information, but as the object of the division was to break the power of the provincial governors it is probable that the division of the province of Berar was as equal as possible. Virtually the whole of the Yavtamal District must have been included in the province of Mahur , and it is not unlikely that the Bembala was the northern boundary ofthis province. Murder of the reformer. -This administrative reform, which should have been undertaken many years earlier, was resented by the old tarafdars, and by none more than by Malik Hasan Nizam-ul-Mulk, the governor of Telingana, who lent himself to a conspiracy the object of which was the death of Khaja Mahmud Gawan, the author of the reform. The plot was disastrously successful; the aged minister was murdered by order of the master whom he had served too faithfully; and the day of his murder was the day from which the decline and fall of the Bahmani kingdom may be dated. Neither Imad-ul-Mulk nor Khudawand Khan, to do them justice, showed any inclination to give countenance to the murderers of Mahmud Gawan. On the contrary, they withdrew from the royal camp, and openly reprobated the murder. Shortly afterwards they returned to their provinces, but a year had not passed before they were recalled by Muhammad Shah to accompany him on an expedition to Goa and the Konkan. They obeyed the summons but, mindful of the fate of the innocent Mahmud, they were careful to place an interval between themselves and the royal army, whether in camp or on the march, and ultimately returned to Gawil and Mahur before the completion of the expedition and without leave. Gawilgarh declared independent. -Muhammad Shah died of drink in 1482 and was succeeded by his son Mahmud Shah, a boy of twelve. All power in the capital passed into the hands of the ministers, and in 1485 was secured by Kasim Band, a Turk. The old tarafdars, well aware that Kasim was the author of all orders issued in the king's name, simply ignored them, and were virtually independent from this time though they maintained a show of submission until 1490 when Yusuf Adil Khan of Bijapur, Ahmad Nizam-ul-Mulk of Ahmadnagar, and Fath-ullah Imad-ul-Mulk of Gawil declared themselves independent. Although Fath-ullah Imad Shah was considered Sultan of Berar, the Yavtamal District and the rest of Southern Berar remained for some years under the rule of Khudawand Khan of Mahur, who was as independent of Gawil as he was of Bidar, though he seems never to have committed himself to a formal declaration of independence. In 1504 both Fath-ullah and Khudawand Khan were appealed to by Mahmud Shah for assistance in punishing Yusuf Adil Shah of Bijapur, who had established the Shiah religion in his new kingdom. The two chieftains, though staunch Sunnis, were unwilling to take arms against their old ally, and one somewhat improbable account of what followed is to the effect that Mahmud Shah and Ahmad Nizam Shah marched into Berar to punish them for their contumacy, and received their submission at Kalam. In the same year (1504) the aged Fath-ullah Imad Shah died and was succeeded in Ellichpur and Gawil by his son Ala-ud-din Imad Shah. The history of the early part of Ala-ud-din's reign is obscure. According to one account he quietly succeeded his father, but according to another he was a prisoner in the fort of Ramgir in Telingana at the time of his father's death, and was in the power of Amir Barid, who had succeeded his father Kasim Barid in Bidar, until he was rescued from captivity by one of the sons of Khudawand Khan. The former account seems to be correct. in 1514 Mahmud Shah made an abortive attempt to escape from the clutches of Amir Barid. It failed owing to his own slothfulness and readiness to take offence, and its failure seems to have exasperated Khudawand Khan of Mahur who occupied himself in raiding and ravaging Amir Barid's territory in the direction of Kandahar and Udgir until, in 1517, Amir Barid, taking Mahmud Shah with him, marched against Mahur and captured it, slaying Khudawand Khan and his eldest son, Sharza Khan. Another son, Mahmud Khan, [In one passage called Ghalib Khan apparently by a scribe's error] was appointed to the command of Mahur as the servant of Ala-ud-din Imad Shah, a politic concession which was evidently intended to hinder the Sultan of Berar from interfering in the affairs of Bidar. Khudawand Khan, though apparently independent, had always been on the most friendly terms with Fath-ullah and invariably acted in concert with him; but Berar was once more united on the death of the governor of Mahur, and the Yavtamal District became part of Ala-ud-din's kingdom. Ala-ud-din Imad Shah. War with Ahmadnagar. -Ala-ud-din Imad Shah became involved in a quarrel with Burhan Nizam Shah of Ahmadnagar regarding Pathri, one of the southern parganas of Berar, the deshpandya watan of which had belonged to the ancestors of the Ahmadnagar kings who were Brahmans, and had fled to Vijayanagar where Malik Hasan Nizam-ul-Mulk was captured in early youth and was brought up as a Musalman. Burhan Nizam Shah had many Brahman relatives, and was naturally anxious to possess the home of his fathers. He proposed to exchange some other pargana for Pathri but Ala-ud-din refused the offer. War ensued and Pathri was taken by Burhan Nizam Shah. In 1527 Ala-ud-din Imad Shah sought help from Sultan Kuli Kutb Shah of Golconda , and with his assistance recovered Pathri, whereupon Burhan Nizam Shah allied himself with Amir Barid of Bidar and once more captured the place. Sultan Kuli Kutb Shah returned to Golconda , and Burhan, who considered that the recapture of Pathri was an in-sufficient punishment for Ala-ud-din, marched on Mahur, which he captured from Mahmud Khan, the son of Khudawand Khan. He then annexed the whole province of Mahur , which included the Yavtamal District, and marched towards Ellichpur with the object of annexing the whole of Berar . Miran Muhammad Shah, of Khandesh, came to the assistance of Ala-ud-din, but the allies were defeated and the whole of Berar fell into the possession of Burhan Nizam Shah. Ala-ud-din next sought help from Bahadur Shah of Gujarat , before whom Burhan and Amir Barid fell back as he entered the Yavtamal District. The kingdom of Ahmadnagar now became the theatre of war, and Ala-ud-din Imad Shah soon had cause to repent of calling to his assistance an ally who showed no disposition to leave the Deccan . Ultimately both Ala-ud-din and Burhan were compelled to unite in requesting Bahadur Shah to return to his own country, which he agreed to do on the condition that Khutbas were recited in his name both in Berar and Ahmadnagar, that the two Sultans paid him tribute, and that the dominions of each were restored to the status in quo ante belium. The Yavtamal District was thus once more included in the dominions of Ala-ud-din Imad Shah. War with Golconda . -This was not the last campaign in which the warlike but unfortunate Ala -ud- din was engaged. Kivam-ul-Mulk who had long been in rebellion against Sultan Kuli Kutb Shah [The title of this king is often wrongly given. " Sultan " was a part of his personal name and not of his royal title. His name before he assumed independence was Sultan Kuli (" the servant of the king ") and his title had been Kutb-ul-Mulk After his assumption of independence he was known as Sultan Kuli Kutb Shah. ] of Golconda , was at last defeated near Yelgandal and took refuge in Berar with Ala-ud-din. Sultan Kuli demanded the surrender of the fugitive and also the restoration of certain districts which in the time of the Bahmanids had belonged to Telingana and not to Berar . On Ala-ud-din's refusal to comply with these requests Sultan Kuli moved towards Berar and Ala-ud-din marched through the Yavtamal District to meet him. A battle was fought near Ramgir and the Beraris were utterly defeated. Ala-ud-din fled back to Ellichpur, and Sultan Kuli Kutb Shah possessed himself of the disputed territory and returned to Golconda . The date of these events is not given, but it seems probable that they took place after the departure of Bahadur Shah of Gujarat from the Deccan . Death of Ala-ud-din Imad shah. -The date of Ala-ud-din's death is not certain, but it seems probable that he died in 1529 and was succeeded by his son Darya Imad Shah, during whose reign the history of the Yavtamal District is a blank. Darya was succeeded in 1561 by his son Burhan Imad Shah, who was imprisoned shortly after his accession by his minister, Tufal Khan the Deccani, who thus became the real ruler of Berar. The troops of Murtaza Nizam Shah of Ahmadnagar invaded Berar in 1572, nominally for the purpose of releasing Burhan Imad Shah from confinement but really with the object of annexing Berar to Ahmadnagar. In the same year both Tufal Khan and Burhan were captured in Narnala, and the Yavtamal District, with the rest of Berar , was annexed to the Ahmadnagar kingdom. Berar an appanage of the Crown of Delhi. -. There is nothing to record in the history of the Yavtamal District for many years after the annexation of Berar by Ahmadnagar. We have no information of the extent to which it was affected by the confused politics of Ahmadnagar, and the military road between Hindustan and the Deccan lay through Western Berar , far from the boundary of the District. In 1596 the District, with the rest of Berar, was ceded by Chand Bibi, the queen-regent of Ahmadnagar, to Sultan Murad, Akbar's son, and the Province thus became once more, after the lapse of two centuries and a half, an appanage of the Crown of Delhi. It was raided and occupied more than once after its cession by troops from Ahmadnagar, but the Nizam Shahi dynasty never succeeded in permanently ousting the Mughals. The Ain-i-Akbari. -The account of Berar in the Ain-i-Akbari was added to that work in 1596-97, and the administrative divisions there enumerated were probably a legacy from the days of the Bahmanids, for Akbar's officers can hardly have had leisure to reorganize the Province, and certainly had no reason to do so. The Yavtamal District comprises the greater part of Akbar's sarkars -of Kalam and Mahur, but some few mahals of these sarkars lay beyond the present limits of the District. Yavtamal appears in the record as the headquarters of a pargana under the name of Yot-Lohara, Yot being the Urdu or Persian corruption of Yevata, the original name of the town; and Lohara the name of a village about three miles to the west of Yavtamal . The suffix mal is a corruption of mahal (pargana-town). A rough estimate makes the land revenue demand in Akbar's time for the area now occupied by the District rather more than ten lakhs of rupees; but this estimate is rather under than over the mark, while it is certain that collection must always have fallen far short of the nominal demand. Akbar died in October 1605 and was succeeded by his eldest son Salim, who assumed the title of Jahangir. Throughout Jahangir's reign Berar was in a disturbed state, but there is little to chronicle regarding the Yavtamal District. About 1613 Berar was settled by Malik Ambar the African, who posed as the champion of the independence of the Deccan , and actually held nearly the whole of the Province during the greater part of the reign of Jahangir. It is not necessary to say much of his settlement save that it was far more reasonable than that of Abul-Fazl who seems to have accepted old estimates of the revenue without reference to the existing resources of the much harried Province. It was Malik Ambar's rather than Abul-Fazl's estimate that formed the basis of subsequent settlements. Capture of a diamond mine. -In 1618 Amrullah, the son of the Khan-i-Khan-an, captured a diamond mine in Gondwana which had been the property of a zamindar of Khandesh. It is probable that this diamond mine was in the Central Provinces , within measurable distance of Kalam, and was identical with the diamond mine captured by the officers of Ahmad Shah Bahmani I in 1425, for diamond mines are not common in this part of India . Prince Shah Jahan. -In 1622 Prince Shah Jahan, who commanded the imperial troops in the Deccan, was recalled in order that he might be ready, with the army of the Deccan, to march on Kandahar and thence invade Persia . He hesitated to obey the order, and later in the year rebelled against his father. The course of his rebellion need not be followed. After widespread operations in Hindustan and Gujarat he was forced to flee to Burhanpur, where the remnant of his army was dispersed by his brother Parwez, and he fled with a few followers through the Yavtamal District to Mahur, pursued by his brother. At Mahur he left his elephants and heavy baggage under the charge of Udai Ram and Yadava Rao of Sindkhed while he fled to Golconda , where he took refuge with Muhammad Kutb Shah. In 1624 Yadava Rao and Udai Ram removed his elephants from Mahur to Burhanpur, where they presented them to Parwez.
No comments:
Post a Comment